Monthly Archives: October 2011


I refuse to call Barack Hussein Obama President Obama for the simple reason that he is NOT the president of the United States of America. No, I’m not advocating impeachment as many Americans are demanding. That method of removing him from office is wrong simply because the African-born man was never legally qualified or elected to be the president, so he cannot be legally impeached. Proof of my allegation is at the end of this article.

In my opinion, Obama/Soetoro quite literally stole, or usurped, the office of president through fraud, and since he is a fraud, EVERY action, law, appointment and executive order he has implemented are without legal force and are not binding on we the people. Impeaching the imposter would give validity to all his illegal, fraudulent acts and actions, making them binding on our nation. So the key is to remove him from his stolen office without impeachment. We must not let our rage blind us to reality – he must be removed some other way.


This information (and the information in the addendum to this article) should be mailed, linked to, hand-delivered or faxed TODAY to every Secretary of State of every state in the Union with a polite demand that Obama be declared ineligible to appear on the ballot in the 2012 election cycle. The courts have betrayed the voters so it is up to the states to protect our Constitution, and our way of life. It is up to the people to DEMAND that the states act. Link to the ADDENDUM (must reading).

The easiest way to navigate this site is to visit the TABLE OF CONTENTS. There you will find brief descriptions and links to all my writings. Oldtimeyman

There are at least two viable ways to accomplish this, but first, let’s re-examine his fraud.

More and more evidence is surfacing proving Obama (excuse me, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, or more appropriately, Barry Soetoro) is NOT the president of the United States. He is in reality an usurper, a pretender, who has seized the office of the president without legal authority or right. Yes, he was “voted” in, but his name never should have been on the ballot and those who committed fraud to place his name in contention are guilty of treason. Once Obama has been removed from the White House, criminal charges certainly will be leveled including, but not limited to: fraud, wire fraud, identity theft, Social Security fraud, theft (of his salary), misuse of the military, theft of government resources (Michelle’s vacation trips on U.S.-government aircraft), and on and on.

How can I and many others make such a claim? Let’s start with the basics. This article will not be a re-hash of the on-going discussion and debate over Obama’s natural-born-citizen (NBC) status, (although it will look like it) but I do have to mention it for the sake of continuity.

During the 2004 race for the Illinois State Senate, Obama was locked in a race with candidate Jack Ryan. Obama won that race, but in the reporting of the event, the Associated Press (AP), which at the time was one of the most prestigious and accurate of American news agencies, more than once noted that Obama was born outside the United States, most likely Kenya.

“…in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at the AP reporter stated the following: “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night…” SOURCE

African newspapers in 2008 gleefully reported on presidential candidate Obama as the “African-American” senator from the U.S. and again, claimed he was African-born. The following excerpt came from the newspaper Modern Ghana, dated Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2008.

Dr. Alan Keyes was chosen by the Republican Party as their replacement candidate against Obama. The following exchange took place during one of their debates.

“…during the Senatorial campaign there was a debate between Barack Obama and Dr. Keyes. This debate was videotaped.

During the debate Dr. Keyes has stated: ”You are not even a Natural born citizen” to which Barack Obama replied: “That’s OK, I am not running for president, I am only running for Senate.” SOURCE 

The newspaper, Modern Ghana, again reported that Obama was born in Kenya, Africa.

“After almost two years of campaigning, Democrat candidate Barrack Obama, Republican John McCain yesterday brought their train to a halt in their respective home states to await the verdict of Americans.

“So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the African-American Senator from Illinois State.

“A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the Kenyan born American ahead of his rival, Senator McCain.” SOURCE

Opposition to Obama’s increasingly dictatorial and unconstitutional administration continues on several fronts.

Attorney Orly Taitz and author/researcher Jerome Corsi seek to force Obama into court to prove his citizenship, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio has formed a cold-case squad to investigate Attorney General Eric Holder and possibly Barack Obama’s involvement in Operation Fast and Furious.

American researcher/writer Devy Kidd lays out the case against impeachment much clearer than I could ever hope to achieve. She also says Obama can’t be impeached and cites legal scholar Dr. Edwin Vierra. Remember, this was written before Obama was sworn in.

“If Obama is not ‘a natural born Citizen’ or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for ‘the Office of President’ (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be ‘elected’ by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the members of the House purport to ‘elect’ Obama, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation,” Vierra said.

“If Obama dares to take the Presidential ‘Oath or Affirmation’ of office, knowing that he is not ‘a natural born Citizen,’ he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for ‘the Office of President,’ he cannot ‘faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,’ or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the ‘Oath or Affirmation’ will be a violation thereof! So, even if the chief justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the ‘Oath or Affirmation,’ Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.

“Third, his purported ‘Oath or Affirmation’ being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped ‘Office of President’ will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.

Despite all the noise out there by Obama’s supporters, it is crystal clear the putative president was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president, Vierra said. Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.

“If Obama does become an usurper posturing as ‘the President,’ Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be ‘removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors’ (see Article II, Section 4).”

Now that Obama is occupying the office of president, what can we legally do? Is there anything we can legally do? The answer is, yes. One method of legal recourse, specifically, is a writ of quo warranto. Quo warranto in the federal system is similar to the state use of the writ of mandamus. Quo warranto serves to end a continuous usurpation thus no statute of limitations applies to the action.

I’m not an attorney and have had no legal training but I read a lot. I recommend you read and check my conclusions and links. That said, to my understanding, a writ of mandamus is a court order (at the state and local level) forcing an elected official to do his job. Quo warranto is an action at the federal level and is intended to prevent a continuing exercise of an unlawfully asserted authority – in other words – a power grab or usurpation. I believe you can understand and possibly agree with me that everything points to the Quo Warranto as one possible legal remedy to remove Obama/Soetoro from the White House.

There is another legal method of recourse that has been used and unfortunately has been ignored by the courts and Congress. That is the Law of Estoppel.

A case involving the Law of Estoppel literally proved that the Democrat National Committee (DNC) and Obama knew and admitted his ineligibility to be president. But our criminal Congress and court system have not followed through – once again throwing any hope of justice on quo warranto. LINK HERE to more fully understand estoppel.

Link HERE and scroll down to more fully and easily understand the law of estoppel.

And finally, as I’ve already written in previous posts, we must not underestimate the power of the county sheriff. (LINK HERE to more fully understand the power of the county sheriff.)

My position was validated with an article published at the on-line website of That article said: “In a US Supreme Court decision involving Sheriff Richard Mack, it was ruled that the county sheriff has the ultimate legal authority in their county, even over the feds. This being the case, I strongly urge all county sheriffs to arrest any government person in their county involved in the willful refusal to carry out the laws of the land. They need to arrest Obama when he comes to their county to campaign and charge him with crimes against the people and the Constitution of the United States. County sheriffs need to arrest Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and John Morton for the same reason. Start at the top and then work down. Perhaps then we can get some leadership in this nation that will uphold the laws instead of ignoring them.”

I would also add that every member of the Congress serving in 2008, the Supreme Court and every federal judge, should be arrested and charged for allowing this travesty to happen.


The law of estoppel REQUIRES a response from the person (respondent) or entity the writ is filed against. The response can be “yes,” “no,” or silence. The catch is if the respondent chooses silence, it is an admission. By his silence Obama admitted to 56 allegations including his Kenyan birth and much more. The Democratic National Committee admits to 27 allegations including promoting Obama as the Democratic Party’s candidate for president knowing he is not constitutionally eligible. PLEASE, PLEASE read this information. Link HERE.



Filed under Uncategorized

Where is this country?

Liberals, “progressives” and other scum in America scream like banshees whenever the “rights” of illegal aliens are “infringed.” Meanwhile, foreigners are entering America with relative impunity – we even give immediate citizenship to any kid whose mother manages to enter American long enough to squeeze out another baby.

I wonder how the liberals and illegal aliens would feel if we imposed the following country’s immigration laws on those who enter our country illegally. Read to the end to find out the name of “THIS COUNTRY.”

 The easiest way to navigate this site is to visit the TABLE OF CONTENTS. There you will find brief descriptions and links to all my writings. Oldtimeyman

THIS COUNTRY welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to THIS COUNTRY’S society:

Foreigners are admitted into THIS COUNTRY “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)

Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)

Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken THIS COUNTRY’S laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)

The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

THIS COUNTRY’S authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)

A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)

A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)

Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

Foreigners who are deported from THIS COUNTRY and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in THIS COUNTRY — such as working with out a permit — can also be imprisoned.

Under THIS COUNTRY’S law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand UNITS OF CURRENCY will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)

Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from THIS COUNTRY instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

THIS COUNTRY’S CITIZENS who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

A RESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into THIS COUNTRY will be fined. (Article 132)

Have you figured out the identity of THIS COUNTRY? The answer is simple. Just replace the phrase THIS COUNTRY with the word, Mexico and UNITS OF CURRENCY with pesos and the mystery is solved.

All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American
immigration preachings is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States.

Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy. Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

VOTE FRAUD – coming soon to a location near YOU!!

The deck has been stacked, the dice loaded and the game rigged for the second biggest public fraud event in our nation’s history. I’m referring, of course, to the 2012 presidential election. I’m going on record now in saying if steps aren’t taken soon, the next president will be chosen by theft.

 The easiest way to navigate this site is to visit the TABLE OF CONTENTS. There you will find brief descriptions and links to all my writings. Oldtimeyman

Touch-screen electronic voting machines were named in several contested key elections nationwide during the last election cycle. Most notable was the Nevada race between Harry Reid and Sharon Angle. The headline in the L.A. Times read: Touch-screen voting machine issues pop up in Nevada to the benefit of Reid (and Angle). The full article can be read by clicking HERE. Read carefully. I for one, found nothing to indicate any benefit whatsoever accruing to Republican Sharon Angle.

Communist icon, Josef Stalin, spoke pointedly about the importance, not of voting but rather the counting of the vote.

“You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.” Bori Bazhanov in Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretary, Pub. 1992

Hints of vote fraud and possible election tampering came to national attention with the disputed Florida vote in the 2000 presidential election. Hanging chads and dented chads became household terms. Republicans blamed Democrats and Democrats blamed Republicans, and the finger pointing continues to this day.

Possible voting fraud was linked to electronic voting machines as early as the 2000-2002 election cycle and the potential for even more massive vote fraud has finally become more widely reported.

Just last month (September) Western Journalism announced on their website that Diebold voting machines could be remotely “hacked” by anyone with an 8th grade education and about $10 in parts.

“Voting machines used by as many as a quarter of American voters heading to the polls in 2012 can be hacked with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science education, according to computer science and security experts at the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois,” and reported by Western Journalism. “The experts say the newly developed hack could change voting results while leaving absolutely no trace of the manipulation behind.”

“We believe these man-in-the-middle attacks are potentially possible on a wide variety of electronic voting machines,” said Roger Johnston, leader of the assessment team “We think we can do similar things on pretty much every electronic voting machine.” Click HERE for the full article.

Click HERE for a FoxNews article about a $26 remote-control hack of a voting machine.

Click HERE for a video of two men hacking a voting machine in about 1 minute.

Witness a demonstration “election” between George Washington and the traitor, Benedict Arnold. Even though all the votes were cast for Washington, computer hacking indicated a totally different result. Cllick HERE for the video.

There is one other factor that should raise everyone’s anxiety level concerning the next election. There are already fears that the next presidential election will be cancelled and Ovomit will declare himself “president for life,” or more correctly, dictator for life.

During a speech to a Rotary Club, N.C. Gov. Bev Perdue suggested suspending Congressional elections for two years so that Congress can focus on economic recovery and not the next election. Suspension of an election for such an sham is a gross violation of the Constitution and should be vigorously opposed by all Patriots.

“I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won’t hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover. I really hope that someone can agree with me on that,” Perdue said. “You want people who don’t worry about the next election.”

The comment — which came during a discussion of the economy — perked more than a few ears. It’s unclear whether Perdue, a Democrat, is serious — but her tone was level and she asked others to support her on the idea.

Later Tuesday afternoon, Perdue’s office clarified the remarks: “Come on,” said spokeswoman Chris Mackey in a statement. “Gov. Perdue was obviously using hyperbole to highlight what we can all agree is a serious problem: Washington politicians who focus on their own election instead of what’s best for the people they serve.”

The Republicans sure are taking it seriously. Here’s a statement from GOP spokesman Rob Lockwood:

“Now is a time when politicians need to be held accountable more than ever. To suspend an election would be removing the surest mechanism that people have to hold politicians accountable: the right to vote. Does the Governor not believe that people of North Carolina have the ability to think for themselves about whether or not the actions of elected officials are working?”

The squeeze is on middle-America. More than half of all Americans rely on a government check or subsidy. More and more lower income Americans are under-employed and losing their jobs. Unemployment stands at 9-percent (if you can believe government numbers). Mis-guided idiots are protesting against Wall Street and demanding higher taxes on the “wealthy.” They are fools for not questioning who is promoting the protest. May I present billionaire activist George Soros, millionaire activist Michael Moore, wealthy activist Susan Sarandon and wealthy activist Alec Baldwin.

Canada Free Press has succinctly identified the problem and put the Wall Street insurrection in perspective.

“Barry Soetoro took the name Barack Hussein Obama, got himself elected and immediately began pushing the country so many look up to, right up to the precipice and nobody—nobody—has been able to stop him,” wrote Judi McLeod, editor at Canada Free Press. “Now when we have a narcissistic Obama plunging in the polls, a democrat governor in North Carolina is pushing the envelope for suspending elections and covering up a notion she dropped a bombshell by claiming she was only using hyperbole to make a point for a Rotary Club.”

McLeod predicts that if the election were held tomorrow, Obama would go down in a landslide strikingly more humiliating than the shellacking he and his party got—and never got over—in the recent midterm elections.

But the 2012 election is more than a year away, and the man who made it all the way to the most powerful office on earth without documents establishing his true, legal identity now has all the booty, and the absolute power it brings, at his command. This is Obama’s position at a time when ONLY suspended elections would guarantee his re-election.

“North Carolina Gov. Bev Perdue was not joking when she spoke about suspending elections. Nor did she pick the idea out of thin air. Perdue was giving the suspend-congressional-elections idea its first oxygen for her hell-bent-for-leather boss,” McLeod wrote. “It is crucial to not let this day go down without remembering what Perdue said.

Don’t let the state-controlled mainstream media lure you back to sleep by saying if there is no election, then why is Obama so diligently campaigning. Obama is not campaigning. He is preparing for Stage Two of the Total Transformation of America, using taxpayer money to prepare his Internet-identified ‘troops’ for the coming Marxist Revolution.”

Ovomit must not be allowed to get away with his continuing fraud and usurpation of the presidency. Patriots should now be doing everything legal to stop him in his tracks, remembering that nothing is impossible when all the control is held by a tyrant as well as a dictator.

CANADA FREE PRESS – “Because without America there is no free world.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized