I refuse to call Barack Hussein Obama President Obama for the simple reason that he is NOT the president of the United States of America. No, I’m not advocating impeachment as many Americans are demanding. That method of removing him from office is wrong simply because the African-born man was never legally qualified or elected to be the president, so he cannot be legally impeached. Proof of my allegation is at the end of this article.
In my opinion, Obama/Soetoro quite literally stole, or usurped, the office of president through fraud, and since he is a fraud, EVERY action, law, appointment and executive order he has implemented are without legal force and are not binding on we the people. Impeaching the imposter would give validity to all his illegal, fraudulent acts and actions, making them binding on our nation. So the key is to remove him from his stolen office without impeachment. We must not let our rage blind us to reality – he must be removed some other way.
This information (and the information in the addendum to this article) should be mailed, linked to, hand-delivered or faxed TODAY to every Secretary of State of every state in the Union with a polite demand that Obama be declared ineligible to appear on the ballot in the 2012 election cycle. The courts have betrayed the voters so it is up to the states to protect our Constitution, and our way of life. It is up to the people to DEMAND that the states act. Link to the ADDENDUM (must reading).
The easiest way to navigate this site is to visit the TABLE OF CONTENTS. There you will find brief descriptions and links to all my writings. Oldtimeyman
There are at least two viable ways to accomplish this, but first, let’s re-examine his fraud.
More and more evidence is surfacing proving Obama (excuse me, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, or more appropriately, Barry Soetoro) is NOT the president of the United States. He is in reality an usurper, a pretender, who has seized the office of the president without legal authority or right. Yes, he was “voted” in, but his name never should have been on the ballot and those who committed fraud to place his name in contention are guilty of treason. Once Obama has been removed from the White House, criminal charges certainly will be leveled including, but not limited to: fraud, wire fraud, identity theft, Social Security fraud, theft (of his salary), misuse of the military, theft of government resources (Michelle’s vacation trips on U.S.-government aircraft), and on and on.
How can I and many others make such a claim? Let’s start with the basics. This article will not be a re-hash of the on-going discussion and debate over Obama’s natural-born-citizen (NBC) status, (although it will look like it) but I do have to mention it for the sake of continuity.
During the 2004 race for the Illinois State Senate, Obama was locked in a race with candidate Jack Ryan. Obama won that race, but in the reporting of the event, the Associated Press (AP), which at the time was one of the most prestigious and accurate of American news agencies, more than once noted that Obama was born outside the United States, most likely Kenya.
“…in a syndicated report, published Sunday, June 27, 2004, by the Kenyan Standard Times, and which was, as of this report, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm the AP reporter stated the following: “Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night…” SOURCE http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/14/ap-declares-obama-kenyan-born/
African newspapers in 2008 gleefully reported on presidential candidate Obama as the “African-American” senator from the U.S. and again, claimed he was African-born. The following excerpt came from the newspaper Modern Ghana, dated Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2008.
Dr. Alan Keyes was chosen by the Republican Party as their replacement candidate against Obama. The following exchange took place during one of their debates.
“…during the Senatorial campaign there was a debate between Barack Obama and Dr. Keyes. This debate was videotaped.
During the debate Dr. Keyes has stated: ”You are not even a Natural born citizen” to which Barack Obama replied: “That’s OK, I am not running for president, I am only running for Senate.” SOURCE http://www.thepostemail.com/2009/10/15/obama-concedes-hes-not-a-nbc-in-obama-vs-keyes-2004-debate/
The newspaper, Modern Ghana, again reported that Obama was born in Kenya, Africa.
“After almost two years of campaigning, Democrat candidate Barrack Obama, Republican John McCain yesterday brought their train to a halt in their respective home states to await the verdict of Americans.
“So far, the odds favour the once underdog in American politics, Obama, the African-American Senator from Illinois State.
“A Congressional Quarterly (CQ) politics monitored on BBC put the Kenyan born American ahead of his rival, Senator McCain.” SOURCE http://www.modernghana.com/news2/189461/1/americans-decide-today-go-obama.html
Opposition to Obama’s increasingly dictatorial and unconstitutional administration continues on several fronts.
Attorney Orly Taitz and author/researcher Jerome Corsi seek to force Obama into court to prove his citizenship, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio has formed a cold-case squad to investigate Attorney General Eric Holder and possibly Barack Obama’s involvement in Operation Fast and Furious.
American researcher/writer Devy Kidd lays out the case against impeachment much clearer than I could ever hope to achieve. She also says Obama can’t be impeached and cites legal scholar Dr. Edwin Vierra. Remember, this was written before Obama was sworn in.
“If Obama is not ‘a natural born Citizen’ or has renounced such citizenship, he is simply not eligible for ‘the Office of President’ (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). That being so, he cannot be ‘elected’ by the voters, by the Electoral College, or by the House of Representatives (see Amendment XII). For neither the voters, nor the Electors, nor members of the House can change the constitutional requirement, even by unanimous vote inter sese (see Article V). If, nonetheless, the voters, the Electors, or the members of the House purport to ‘elect’ Obama, he will be nothing but a usurper, because the Constitution defines him as such. And he can never become anything else, because a usurper cannot gain legitimacy if even all of the country aid, abets, accedes to, or acquiesces in his usurpation,” Vierra said.
“If Obama dares to take the Presidential ‘Oath or Affirmation’ of office, knowing that he is not ‘a natural born Citizen,’ he will commit the crime of perjury or false swearing (see Article II, Section 1, Clause 7). For, being ineligible for ‘the Office of President,’ he cannot ‘faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,’ or even execute it at all, to any degree. Thus, his very act of taking the ‘Oath or Affirmation’ will be a violation thereof! So, even if the chief justice of the Supreme Court himself looks the other way and administers the ‘Oath or Affirmation,’ Obama will derive no authority whatsoever from it.
“Third, his purported ‘Oath or Affirmation’ being perjured from the beginning, Obama’s every subsequent act in the usurped ‘Office of President’ will be a criminal offense under Title 18, United States Code, Section 242.
Despite all the noise out there by Obama’s supporters, it is crystal clear the putative president was born with dual citizenship and is forever ineligible to be president, Vierra said. Obama seized the office of president through fraud. As a usurper, he’s never held office. That’s what the word usurp means: to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right. Since he legally has never occupied the White House as president, he cannot be impeached.
“If Obama does become an usurper posturing as ‘the President,’ Congress cannot even impeach him because, not being the actual President, he cannot be ‘removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors’ (see Article II, Section 4).”
Now that Obama is occupying the office of president, what can we legally do? Is there anything we can legally do? The answer is, yes. One method of legal recourse, specifically, is a writ of quo warranto. Quo warranto in the federal system is similar to the state use of the writ of mandamus. Quo warranto serves to end a continuous usurpation thus no statute of limitations applies to the action.
I’m not an attorney and have had no legal training but I read a lot. I recommend you read and check my conclusions and links. That said, to my understanding, a writ of mandamus is a court order (at the state and local level) forcing an elected official to do his job. Quo warranto is an action at the federal level and is intended to prevent a continuing exercise of an unlawfully asserted authority – in other words – a power grab or usurpation. I believe you can understand and possibly agree with me that everything points to the Quo Warranto as one possible legal remedy to remove Obama/Soetoro from the White House.
There is another legal method of recourse that has been used and unfortunately has been ignored by the courts and Congress. That is the Law of Estoppel.
A case involving the Law of Estoppel literally proved that the Democrat National Committee (DNC) and Obama knew and admitted his ineligibility to be president. But our criminal Congress and court system have not followed through – once again throwing any hope of justice on quo warranto. LINK HERE to more fully understand estoppel. http://www.irishufology.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=9097&pid=11640&st=0&%23entry11640
Link HERE and scroll down to more fully and easily understand the law of estoppel.
And finally, as I’ve already written in previous posts, we must not underestimate the power of the county sheriff. (LINK HERE to more fully understand the power of the county sheriff.)
My position was validated with an article published at the on-line website of godfatherpolitics.com. That article said: “In a US Supreme Court decision involving Sheriff Richard Mack, it was ruled that the county sheriff has the ultimate legal authority in their county, even over the feds. This being the case, I strongly urge all county sheriffs to arrest any government person in their county involved in the willful refusal to carry out the laws of the land. They need to arrest Obama when he comes to their county to campaign and charge him with crimes against the people and the Constitution of the United States. County sheriffs need to arrest Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano and John Morton for the same reason. Start at the top and then work down. Perhaps then we can get some leadership in this nation that will uphold the laws instead of ignoring them.” http://godfatherpolitics.com/1651/immigration-agents-ordered-to-defy-court-orders/
I would also add that every member of the Congress serving in 2008, the Supreme Court and every federal judge, should be arrested and charged for allowing this travesty to happen.
THE PROOF I PROMISED
The law of estoppel REQUIRES a response from the person (respondent) or entity the writ is filed against. The response can be “yes,” “no,” or silence. The catch is if the respondent chooses silence, it is an admission. By his silence Obama admitted to 56 allegations including his Kenyan birth and much more. The Democratic National Committee admits to 27 allegations including promoting Obama as the Democratic Party’s candidate for president knowing he is not constitutionally eligible. PLEASE, PLEASE read this information. Link HERE.