A Lubbock County Texas judge is warning of what he calls a ‘civil war’ and possible invasion by United Nations troops if President Barack Obama is re-elected.
Judge Tom Head is convinced that an Obama re-election to a second term would lead to a revolt by the American people and he is pushing a tax increase for the district attorney’s office and the Lubbock County Sheriff’s Office. He says the money is needed to “beef up” its resources in case Obama wins the November election.
In the event of civil unrest Judge Head said he’s concerned the President would hand over sovereignty of the United States to the U.N. and that the American public would react violently.
“He’s going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the U.S. to the United Nations (and) what’s going to happen when that happens?” Judge Head told FOX 34 in Lubbock.
“I’nm thinking worse case scenario,” Judge Head explained. “Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe…we’re not just talking a few riots or demonstrations.”
The West Texas judge’s proposed tax increase is to help the sheriff’s office hire a law enforcement large enough to protect the county and to drive away the invaders.
“I don’t want rookies,” Head said flatly. “I want trained, equip(ped) and seasoned veteran officers to back me.”
The republican judge said that he himself will meet the enemy, “in front of their armored personnel carriers” to tell them they are not welcome, and has the county sheriff to back him up. “I don’t want U.N. troops in Lubbock County,” he said. SOURCE
Could we be looking at militias being formed within the military? Militias with the avowed goal of assassination of the president and the takeover of the government?
Don’t laugh. A recent article by the Associated Press, published on The Hill blog, claims some Army soldiers formed a militia group in Georgia that plotted to overthrow the U.S. government — and they killed a fellow soldier and his girlfriend to keep the plot secret
The group of former and activity duty U.S. service members spent at least $87,000 on guns and bomb components, prosecutors said.
The anarchist allegations emerged Monday during the trial where four soldiers are accused of killing former soldier Michael Roark and his 17-year-old girlfriend Tiffany York, to stop their plan from being revealed.
“This domestic terrorist organization did not simply plan and talk,” prosecutor Isabel Pauley told the judge. “Prior to the murders in this case, the group took action. Evidence shows the group possessed the knowledge, means and motive to carry out their plans.”
The militia group’s name is F.E.A.R., which stands for Forever Enduring Always Ready. Prosecutors did not know how many members the group had, according to published reports. SOURCE
BUT WAIT! There’s more. If such fears exist over an Obama election, what fears could some Americans be harboring in the event he loses the election?
Are we looking at a possible race war? A labor union uprising coupled with a nation-wide occupy movement? Whatever may happen the federal government is busy preparing for some type of rebellion.
The Department of Homeland Security has bought more than a billion rounds of ammunition, which many fear is a sign the federal government is preparing for civil unrest in the United States.
DHS officials have been making preparations for what looks like a civil war.
In addition to the billions of rounds of bullets, the DHS has been ordering riot gear, bulletproof traffic-stop booths and even more bullets — .357-Magnum rounds capable of shooting through walls. SOURCE
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has put in an order for 46,000 rounds of .40-caliber hollow-point bullets. SOURCE
Ask yourself, what possible reason could there be for the federal government to arm weathermen and women?
First it was the Department of Homeland Security, then it was the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and now the Social Security Administration is set to purchase 174,000 rounds of “.357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow point pistol ammunition.” that will be delivered to 41 locations across the country. SOURCE
The CATO Institute, a right-leaning think-tank, recently published a paper which includes a discussion of expanding federal police power.
Since the 1980s the federal government has prompted the militarization of federal, state, and local law enforcement. That militarization has led not only to well-publicized disasters, such as Waco and Ruby Ridge, but to a widespread increase in violent law enforcement, which has played a major role in alienating Americans from their government. Such baleful consequences are the result of another dangerous trend, the expansion of the power of federal criminal justice far beyond its legitimate constitutional limits. Law and order begin at the top; the most important criminal justice reforms that Congress can enact are those that return federal law enforcement to its constitutional role.
The Constitution specifically authorizes federal enforcement of only three types of laws, all of which involve uniquely federal concerns. The first is based on the congressional power “To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States.” The counterfeiting enforcement power immediately follows the delegation of power to Congress to “coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin.”
The second congressional criminal power is “To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations.” The third is, “Congress shall have Power to declare Punishment of Treason.” Although counterfeiting, treason, and piracy clearly involve areas of federal, not state, concern, it is notable that, even in those cases, the authors of the Constitution felt a need specifically to authorize congressional law enforcement.
While the body of the Constitution grants only narrow criminal powers to the federal government, the Bill of Rights, in the Tenth Amendment, specifically reserves to the states all powers not granted to the federal government.
Madison, Hamilton, and Jefferson were right to recognize that law enforcement is properly a local matter. As former attorney general Edwin Meese put it, “Federal law-enforcement authorities are not as attuned to the priorities and customs of local communities as state and local law enforcement. In the Ruby Ridge tragedy, for example, would the local Idaho authorities have tried to apprehend Weaver in such an aggressive fashion? . . . More fundamentally, would Idaho officials have cared about two sawed-off shotguns? In the Waco situation, would the local sheriff’s department have stormed the compound, or instead have waited to arrest David Koresh when he ventured into town for supplies, as he did frequently?” SOURCE
Here’s some more food for thought. The law of Posse Comitatus forbids the government from using the military against our civilian population. But if the feds arm most of the bureaucracy and train them in military and police tactics, they won’t need the military to effectively solidify their dictatorial grip on our nation. And in the event that doesn’t work the government is preparing for military action against We The People.
Please read the following articles:
U.S. Army tactical manual describes how to control domestic (civilian) insurrection.
U.S. military officers are told to plan to fight Americans.
For additional information on the subject of a federally-controlled police state click HERE.